Mathrubootham not too long ago introduced his intent to exit as govt chairman of Freshworks from 1 December, and has turned his consideration completely to Collectively Fund, an AI-focused enterprise fund he launched together with Eka Software program founder Manav Garg in 2021.
On this Mint interview, Mathrubootham talks about his transition, the Collectively Fund’s funding technique, the buyer AI enterprise the fund is incubating with Dutch funding agency Prosus, and the necessity for constructing an enabling AI ecosystem and investing in AI analysis.
Mathrubootham additionally addressed the looming geopolitical problem and the crucial to realize AI sovereignty by overcoming India’s dependency on international fashions and collaborating to construct a home AI stack. Edited excerpts:
Was there a tipping level that made you resolve to give attention to Collectively Fund and AI?
One in every of my life classes has been about using a wave. In 1998–99, I ran a Java coaching enterprise and located it straightforward to scale. However I needed to shut down the Java coaching institute in 2001 after getting back from the US. What mattered was not that I used to be a greater coach in 2001, however that the wave was gone. I requested the identical query earlier than beginning Freshworks. I used to be completely satisfied and well-paid at Zoho, however after I noticed the SaaS wave coming, I knew I needs to be using that.
I believe that is one thing very related; it’s nearly like a déjà vu second. At Freshworks, we weren’t afraid of any competitors, however AI was crucial factor that might change the trajectory of the enterprise. We noticed the huge disruptive potential after the ChatGPT demo in November 2022. As a product particular person, I acquired very excited. I’ve spent 15 years working one firm; now, I take a look at my function as ‘how can I allow a whole bunch of corporations?’.
SaaS was the catalyst for the dream of India as a product nation, and now AI is the accelerator.
Was it a bittersweet second to step away from Freshworks, or had you ready for it?
It was a well-thought-out transition plan. It was not a single second. We employed Dennis Woodside in September 2022, and we practiced working as ‘two within the field’ for 18 months. I then stayed on for an additional year-and-a-half to complete the transition, write the AI technique for the corporate, and rent the following management crew. The transition occurred in my thoughts the minute I gave the CEO title.
What’s Collectively Fund’s AI philosophy now, and the way do you view startups on this house?
Since India presently lacks its personal foundational fashions (like OpenAI or China’s DeepSeek), the chance for Collectively Fund is predominantly within the enterprise software house and developer instruments. We’ve the expertise to know the workflows and buyer issues in enterprise functions, permitting us to make use of out there AI expertise successfully.
We see super alternative in enterprise functions, each horizontal and vertical in a number of industries. From developer instruments to protection tech. A key space is shopper AI.
Till now, shopper AI has all the time been within the arms of the businesses. Like, Netflix makes use of AI to advocate films for you. Amazon makes use of AI to advocate merchandise for you. How about you having your individual AI to provide you personalised suggestions? We’ve not constructed that but. We’ve partnered with Prosus and we’re going to incubate an organization.
From an funding technique standpoint, we’ve three pillars or three vectors alongside which we function. That is predominantly primarily based on the founder archetypes that we work with.
Netflix makes use of AI to advocate films. Amazon makes use of AI to advocate merchandise. How about having your individual AI for personalised suggestions?
On one finish, we’ve the Swarm Area Studio, an initiative that comes with AI, entry to AI analysis, AI lab, and neighborhood. Swarm Area is for principally youthful founders who’re usually both in school or simply out of faculty. They’re superb in tech, however they’ve by no means constructed corporations. They do not actually perceive buyer issues.
We’ve a 24-year-old founder referred to as Akshat (Tyagi), who’s the founding father of Metaforms. The corporate will in all probability hit $5 million now. Akshat has by no means labored in any firm. So he doesn’t perceive enterprise. Now he has entered the ‘market analysis’ market and he has quite a lot of Fortune 500 corporations which are utilizing his merchandise.
Then we’ve the common VC offers that we do. Emergent (AI coding platform) is an efficient instance of that, the place the CTO of Dunzo (former chief expertise officer, Mukund Jha) needed to start out up along with his twin brother. So he got here and met me and we determined to speculate.
After I say a typical VC deal, we purpose for 15–20% possession. We could write a $2–5 million examine. In Swarm Area Studio, we write the checks normally as much as $1 million… and purpose for 8–10% (possession) of the corporate.
On the opposite finish, we’ve an incubation technique, the place we’ve the thought, we’re developing with what sort of firm we would like and which house we would like. Like I informed you, the buyer AI house, the place we’ve partnered with Prosus and dedicated a complete of $15 million. We’ve 50% coming from Collectively Fund and 50% coming from Prosus.
Now, we’re discovering the preliminary founding crew who will consider within the thought and who’ve the potential to execute on that concept. That’s the third mannequin, the place our ownerships will likely be larger, as a result of we’re like a co-founder.
The web is open and handled as a public good. That’s not the case with AI. Nations are utilizing it as a geopolitical device. In your view, what’s the threat that India faces? How ought to India strategy it?
Positively, AI is a geopolitical device. However so is tech itself. Like see, Amazon and Google and Fb, they’re all powers, software program powers. They will resolve who can have entry to [their platforms] if they need.
India’s delicate energy is in IT and tech. So we’ve to construct our personal capabilities. That’s the brief reply.
Everyone has to collaborate. The federal government has to collaborate with trade and academia, and actually have a targeted effort the place we’ve to chop our reliance on these [global] fashions, as a result of each nation is beginning to go in direction of sovereignty.
It’s going to be a theme that we’ve to dwell with, not that we would like it. In our technology, we’ve been beneficiaries of globalization. We’re beginning to see nationalism and sovereignty play a much bigger function. So we’ll have to arrange for that. And I’m positive the federal government is engaged on making a few of these issues occur.
Now that you’re concerned in AI, and the federal government has its AI Mission, will we see you working with the federal government in an advisory or a extra energetic capability?
I believe we are going to in all probability work with the startups constructing these options. We can even set up tie-ups with academia. Personally, I don’t suppose I’m certified to be an AI advisor to the federal government. There are deep technical consultants who will in all probability play a greater function there. However we will certainly work with these younger startups which are constructing deep tech.
Contemplating AI continues to be evolving, what are you telling startups about constructing a moat?
One benefit that startups have is they’ll transfer quick and adapt. A superb instance is Composio, which is considered one of our portfolio corporations. Once they began, they began off with making an attempt to construct agentic integrations. However when the Mannequin Context Protocol (MCP) was launched by Anthropic, they had been one of many first ones to undertake it and shortly construct your complete MCP infrastructure, the place at present Composio is extensively cherished and used.
Greater than moat, I’d say pace of execution creates the chance to serve the market when the necessity is scorching. Then, adoption turns into the moat—having increasingly prospects.
Then again, on the enterprise software aspect, I’ve talked in regards to the music and gadget analogy. AI by itself is a gadget. What the client values is the music. We are able to throw away the gadget, however we maintain on to the music.
AI by itself is a gadget. What the client values is the music. We are able to throw away the gadget, however we maintain on to the music.
Can you actually clear up buyer issues nicely? Should you actually take a look at enterprises, they actually don’t care about whether or not you’re utilizing OpenAI or Claude or DeepSeek. What they care about is, “Hey, should you’re, let’s say, automating the decision centre, are you able to do it with out sacrificing my buyer expertise? And might you give me 70% automation, 50% automation? And if my prospects are pleased with the standard of the assist and if my CFO is pleased with the fee, then I’ll purchase these instruments”. So, our recommendation to founders has all the time been to give attention to the music.
However typically large strikes occur, particularly within the developer device house. For instance, OpenAI not too long ago launched its agent toolkit. What OpenAI is making an attempt to do is sort of a phenomenal play to try to turn out to be the working system of the long run… That’s the large play. Corporations like Microsoft and Google needs to be fearful.
[OpenAI] constructed an agent toolkit that enables anyone to construct connectors to their apps. That places startups that had been doing that in danger. Issues are altering quick. That is all a part of the sport. There’s such a gold rush that some individuals will likely be profitable, [while] some individuals will likely be falling behind and failing. However the ones who will win are those who’re making the picks and shovels, as in any gold rush. That’s our job, to seek out sufficient people who find themselves making the picks and shovels.
What are you in search of if you assess startups to put money into?
We’re an early-stage [investment] agency. Many occasions we’re pre-revenue, pre-product. A very powerful wager is on the founders: what makes them distinctive, or what’s their X issue, or what’s their tremendous energy. And we then take a look at are they making an attempt to resolve a tough drawback? The issue must be onerous, in any other case 100 individuals will do it. Then we additionally take a look at what offers them the best to truly win and to have the ability to crack that arduous drawback.
For me, profitable founders are those who’ve spent sufficient time worrying about the issue area. If expertise is on the market, anyone can construct it. However a deep understanding of the issue area is what’s required. That’s the place we spend our time.
We additionally take a look at: have they got the flexibility to persuade people who find themselves as good as them or smarter than them to affix them? This can be a lengthy journey. The entire sport is expertise.
After which we additionally take a look at craftsmanship. No matter they’re constructing, no person goes to purchase it as a result of it’s low-cost. The India low-cost play has ended. It’s a must to actually have a world-class product. After which, clearly, the market. Is that this a sufficiently big market the place a big firm may be constructed?
There’s an expectation from AI startups of fast income progress. Has this modified?
I believe over the past six months, I’d say our learnings are additionally evolving with sure nuances. There’s one set of AI-native corporations that I wrote about as ‘cheetah corporations’. These corporations are actually scaling quick, like Emergent. $10 million in two months, $50 million in three months. Once they went to $10 million, they’d like 10 members. Now they’re in all probability 15, 20.
However the level is that this isn’t a mannequin that may work for each AI startup. As we speak our nuanced understanding is, for one set of corporations, particularly round fully new areas like vibe coding, you’ve gotten these ‘cheetah corporations’ potential.
However it’s fairly okay to have perhaps one other AI-native startup, like we’ve Unstract, which is promoting to bigger enterprises. These are $200,000–300,000 offers that undergo the enterprise gross sales cycle. These are deep technical merchandise which need to be built-in into the info engineering groups, they usually have to guage it and put it in manufacturing. The gross sales cycles are longer. However that’s tremendous as a result of the shoppers nonetheless love the product.
The enterprise adoption is proving the product market match. They could not really scale to $10−15 million in two months, it’s tremendous. However after they elevate their follow-on funding and rent a GTM (go-to-market) crew, they’ll get some pace and velocity.
It’s been 4 years of Collectively Fund. How would you charge its efficiency?
What we’ve managed to perform as a model, we’re actually proud [of] as a crew, as a result of at present Collectively is being in contrast with the highest ones within the nation—Accel or Lightspeed or Peak XV. That, I believe, is an outstanding accomplishment as a result of these are manufacturers which have been there and these are international manufacturers. We take quite a lot of satisfaction that we’ve performed good work to earn that repute as a model.
We made the decision to pivot to AI a lot earlier than all people else and we made some actually good AI investments.
We’re additionally lucky that we made some proper selections, the place the fund’s efficiency is doing rather well and that’s being appreciated by buyers. We made the decision to pivot to AI a lot earlier than all people else and we made some actually good AI investments, that are paying off rather well.
You take a look at corporations like Emergent or Composio or Confido Well being or Spry, or Shows AI. All these corporations are doing nicely. We’ve many corporations which have scaled previous $5 million, which is a rarity within the startup world. When you’re investing in early-stage [startups], I believe having so many corporations which have crossed $5 million and $8 million can be a good constructive signal.
The Freshworks IPO was the metric to outline your success to a sure extent as a founder. Whenever you take a look at Collectively Fund, what will likely be that success metric for you?
That’s very clear in my thoughts. If we’re in a position to create the following 10 international AI corporations from India, and if Collectively is a part of that, that’s success.








